What is a disadvantage of a handheld radio transceiver's short flexible antenna compared to a full-sized quarter-wave antenna?
Why A "rubber duck" is a physically shortened antenna, usually a helically wound coil, that is electrically loaded to look resonant to the radio. Shortening an antenna lowers its radiation resistance and raises losses, so much of the transmitter power is dissipated as heat in the loading coil and matching rather than radiated. A full-size quarter-wave whip radiates a much larger fraction of the power fed to it, so it both transmits and receives better.
Watch out Polarization is set by how the antenna is oriented, not by its length, and a vertical rubber duck is still vertically polarized. Desensitization comes from strong nearby transmitters overloading the receiver front end, and a less efficient antenna would if anything pick up less of that.
Short antenna = short on efficiency. Shrinking the antenna shrinks the radiated power, not the polarization.