Which of the following paths is most likely to support long-distance propagation on 160 meters?
Why On 160 meters the D layer is the limiting factor: daytime ionization absorbs low-frequency signals before they can reach the F layer and return. Absorption falls roughly as the inverse square of frequency, so at 1.8 MHz even modest D-layer ionization kills the path. Only when the entire path lies in darkness does the D layer recombine enough to let the signal make it to the F layer and back, which is why topband DX is worked in the middle of the night, ideally around gray line.
Watch out A sunlit path is exactly the worst case, since the D layer is fully ionized. High-latitude paths add auroral absorption and flutter, and a north-south path matters for transequatorial propagation on VHF, not for 160 meter absorption.
Topband loves the dark: 160 m DX needs the whole path in night, no D layer, no absorption.